delivery partners
Capture the delivery-partner relationship rather than assuming employment.
Industry verification planning
Distinguish platform participation, independent work and payroll employment across on-demand service engagements.
Start with the actual job
The legal employer, deployment client and assignment history should remain separate in high-volume intake.
Capture the delivery-partner relationship rather than assuming employment.
Record the field-work contractor or direct client engagement.
Identify the source able to confirm the particular on-demand service claim.
Use repeatable consent and document requests while preserving each candidate's individual source responses and opportunity to clarify.
These are planning examples, not client case studies, mandatory check lists or a guarantee of hiring suitability.
Purpose before package
These are starting points for agreeing a scope, not a blanket package for every person in this sector. Confirm duties, consent, source access and the employer's requirements first.
Match the candidate's identity to the records being checked. Explain name changes or spelling differences before approaching sources.
Prepare platform or contracting entity, relationship type and dates; do not collect account passwords or unrelated customer histories.
An agreed professional or contracting source may confirm a gig engagement when conventional HR payroll verification does not apply.
Court, police, database and other checks are not automatic additions. Agree their purpose, permitted sources and limitations separately. A name-only match is not a confirmed adverse finding. Review available services.
Prepare records, not excess data
Prepare platform or contracting entity, relationship type and dates; do not collect account passwords or unrelated customer histories.
An agreed professional or contracting source may confirm a gig engagement when conventional HR payroll verification does not apply.
Collect candidate documents only through the agreed secure intake. The public enquiry below is for business scope, not identity documents, employee records or account credentials.
Read the document preparation guideResolve ambiguity before a finding
No. Clarify the nature and dates of each engagement and report the evidence. Any conflict with the proposed employer's terms is a separate policy decision, not an assumption drawn from overlapping dates alone.
Request clarification, identify any agreed alternative source and distinguish an unavailable response from a confirmed discrepancy. The report should state which claim was checked, what the source returned and what remains unresolved. The employer makes its own policy decision.
Share candidate numbers, hiring roles, locations and the employers or qualifications per candidate. The quote and expected window depend on that scope, record completeness, source response and any field method. This guide does not publish a fixed price or guaranteed deadline.
Agree a practical scope
Share the roles and hiring locations. We will confirm the proposed checks, evidence requirements, exclusions and next steps.
No candidate documents are needed in this enquiry. Include only business requirements, not another person's sensitive records.